Edward D. Lanquist and Benjamin West Janke of Baker Donelson examine 2025 copyright decisions addressing AI training and fair use, highlighting judicial concerns over piracy and market harm.

U.S. justices leave human authorship rule intact, reinforcing legal limits on AI intellectual property claims.

Normally when a government extends a piece of copyright law we expect it to be in the favour of commercial interests with deep pockets and little care for their consumers. But in Denmark they do ...

In 2025, U.S. courts issued the first substantive, merits-stage decisions addressing whether the use of copyrighted works to train generative artificial intelligence systems constitutes "fair use." ...

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Sadly, copyright and AI are something of a mess. The race to develop the most advanced AI models shows no sign of slowing anytime ...

The Trump administration has unveiled an ambitious blueprint for U.S. dominance of artificial intelligence, outlining actions to accelerate innovation, build infrastructure and lead internationally.

A Long-Running AI Copyright Question Gets an Answer as Supreme Court Stays Mum ...

In a significant decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently ruled that the Copyright Act of 1976 requires human authorship to register ...

Cox Communications was sued for copyright infringement by Sony Music and other labels on behalf of their artists. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the $1 billion judgment against Cox, ...

Small digital creators are allegedly struggling to defend their trademarks and content against other companies and creators over what they say are dated laws governing digital entrepreneurship, ...