Federal cuts to SNAP under the One Big Beautiful Bill will force states to consider new costs for the nutrition program.

The Trump administration's recent cuts to Medicaid and SNAP are forcing states to reassess financial priorities, as federal ...

Nearly 268,000 Hoosiers are about to lose Medicaid, 128,000 of them are about to lose SNAP benefits, and everyone is going to ...

The financial balance of U.S. states faces a significant challenge as recent federal policies shift the responsibility and costs of essential social programs onto their budgets. The question is not if ...

These changes mark the most substantial SNAP cuts in the program's history and affect both federal funding and eligibility rules.

A wide array of hunger and health care advocates are hoping to mitigate the effects of some provisions in Trump’s budget bill ...

States, already facing cuts to services by Trump administration, now trying to figure out how to fit Medicaid and SNAP cuts into their budgets.

Opinion: A SNAP cost-share would hit states twice Opinion: The unconscionably high cost of cutting federal food programs House Ag Republicans struggle with spending cuts; state SNAP cost-share ...

There are some projected savings, but Connecticut will see some significant fiscal impacts under the new federal law.

Kevin Wehner has been there for Missourians as they have dealt with unanswered questions, long wait times and the confusion ...

Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' promising tax cuts and federal program reductions could cost Oklahoma upwards of $1 billion due to Medicaid and SNAP cuts. State lawmakers discuss potential implications.

Cost of programs pushed from federal to state Jacskon said the bill does push some of the costs for SNAP and Medicaid to the state of Ohio and the counties. "It is understandable why the bill does ...