Supreme Court, Trump
Digest more
6don MSN
Supreme Court sides with immigration judges in speech case for now, rebuffing Trump administration
The Supreme Court is siding with immigration judges and rebuffing the Trump administration for now in a case that could have wider implications for federal workers as the justices weigh expanding pres
The Supreme Court will take up Trump-related cases in its new term, as well as cases dealing with gay and transgender issues and campaigns.
A bedrock legal doctrine called "stare decisis," Latin for "to stand by things decided," calls upon courts to respect their prior precedents when resolving new cases on similar matters. A basic tenet of U.S. law is that stare decisis promotes consistency and predictability in the law.
The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a legal case that could vastly expand presidential powers. At stake are 90 years of precedent that have kept presidents from being able to remove members of independent government agencies.
Bayer is asking the Supreme Court to make the federal label a shield against accountability. But a label cannot be a shield when it is printed with ink synthesized from ghostwritten studies and outdated science. Regulatory agencies may falter, and science will always evolve.
The Avid Outdoorsman on MSN
Supreme Court will hear a major case on drug use and gun rights
The Supreme Court is about to test how far the government can go in tying drug use to the... The post Supreme Court Will Hear a Major Case on Drug Use and Gun Rights appeared first on The Avid Outdoorsman.
SCOTUSblog on MSNOpinion
Which Supreme Court cases are actually important?
Does the Supreme Court decide its cases based on rank partisanship rather than legal principles? Many scholars and commentators unhesitatingly answer in the affirmative. Such individuals […]