Divided along ideological lines, the U.S. Supreme Court on April 29, 2006, issued a ruling that severely weakens a provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965. That provision, known as Section ...
As the U.S. Supreme Court hears a challenge to birthright citizenship, civil rights groups warn that weakening the 14th Amendment could put long-standing constitutional protections at risk and leave ...
SCOTUSblog on MSN
In major Voting Rights Act case, Supreme Court strikes down redistricting map challenged as racially discriminatory
The Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down a Louisiana congressional map that a group of voters who describe themselves as ...
Legal experts note the decision narrows race-based redistricting, though its effect on South Carolina is expected to be minimal.
Black Louisiana voters and civil rights advocates call on the US Supreme Court to uphold a fair and representative ...
Hail to the Supreme Court for slapping down the obsessive use of race in drawing electoral lines — recognizing that it has ...
Attorneys for the former adviser of the Indiana Daily Student plan to refile the matter in Monroe County within the next month.
This is bigger than Louisiana. This is bigger than the Congressional Black Caucus. This is about our democracy,” says U.S.
The justices, split along ideological lines, found that Louisiana’s voting map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
The Court struck down the state’s new congressional map, saying it relied too heavily on race and was unconstitutional.
Frisco’s town manager could implement water conservation measures outside of the standard triggers outlined in the town’s ...
Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet got a farm bill amendment passed to allow families to purchase rotisserie chickens with SNAP ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results