33. Under the circumstances, and for the reasons supra, the arrest of the petitioners is held to be illegal for breach of mandatory provision under Section 41A Cr.P.C. CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, & N.

Section 376D and Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code. The Nachna, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. District and Sessions Judge, Pokaran (Jaisalmer). 7. The prosecution has examined one witness so far.

Over a period of time, we have noticed two things, i.e., (i) either bail is granted after the charge is framed and just. before the victim is to be examined by the prosecution bef ...

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail following the wellsettled rule that bail is rule and jail is ...

We have no hesitation to say that in the above circumstances it can only be held that the twin conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, are not satisfied and on the sole reason that the accused is ...

This matter was called on for hearing today. Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh. 8. With the above order, I.A. No.208763/2024 stands disposed of.

1) Supreme Court: Senthil Balaji judgment- Requirement Of Expeditious Trial Must Be Read Into Special Statutes Imposing Stringent Bail Provisions Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Augustine George Masih, JJ.

(III) The additional eligibility criteria specified in the MV Act and MV Rules generally for driving 'transport vehicles' would apply only to those intending to operate vehicles with gross vehicle ...

RUP BAHADUR MAGAR @ SANKI@ RABIN Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL . HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA Date : 02-09-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today. Issue notice returnable on 4th ...

In a recent decision in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. List the matter before this Bench on 08.01.2024 Court has submitted the report, which has been perused by us.

The contempt jurisdiction of this Court cannot be construed by any formulaic or rigid approach. Merely because there is no prohibitory order or no specific direction issued the same would not mean ...

Thus, although Section 52 of the Act 1882 does not render a transfer pendente lite void yet the court while exercising contempt jurisdiction may be justified to pass directions either for reversal of ...